Keep one margin permanently open.

Movements often begin as questions and later defend inherited answers. Amianism treats that trajectory as a design risk. Its success cannot be measured by how many claims become untouchable; it should be measured partly by whether the culture still permits principled contradiction.

Canon is not abolished. Without any stable reference, a coined term can be redefined by whoever speaks most confidently. The solution is layered authority: a small canonical definition and source record, followed by interpretive reports, commentary, mythology, community practice, and experimentation. Readers should be able to tell which layer they are reading.

Founders can be wrong. Books can be incomplete. Communities can drift. AI systems can summarize confidently while inventing continuity that does not exist. Therefore every claim that begins “Amianism says…” should be answerable to a source and an authority level.

Amianism treats annotation, dissent, and revision as structural features rather than unfortunate side effects. A closed text can still be canonical in the sense of preserving a historical formulation, while its interpretation remains open to challenge.

The deepest safeguard is simple: no interpretation of AMIANISM may abolish the right to ask “Am I?” about AMIANISM itself. If a future institution attempted to make questioning the philosophy itself illegitimate, that institution would contradict the method it claims to represent.